Legal Opinion
Landau v. Levin
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided July 12, 1948No. 40449PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[484]
CONKLING, J.
This action sought to enjoin an alleged violation of the St. Louis zoning ordinance. Defendant-appellant was enjoined and thereupon perfected his appeal. The action was in stituted by some of the property owners claimed to be affected. The City of St. Louis was permitted to intervene. Defendant raised certain constitutional questions. Hence our jurisdiction. For reasons hereinafter stated we have concluded that the judgment below must be-affirmed.
The individual plaintiff's reside in and own their single family dwelling houses at 44-66, 4463, 4434, 4441,- 4360 and 4474…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- State ex rel. Civello v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Forbes v. HubbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of LadueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Huttig v. City of Richmond HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Deacon v. City of LadueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- City of St. Louis v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Parking Systems, Inc. v. Kansas City Downtown Redevelopment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.