Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Friedman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 13, 1948No. 40717PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[476]

CLARK, J.

Defendant .appeals fronda decree, of-.thecir-cuit court, enjoining Rer from psing-,her real, estate in a. certain manner .in-violation of-the city’s zoning-ordinance. . ,

Respondent questions our jurisdiction, ■ which appellant ■ attempts to invoke on two grounds-.- (1) this is, a..eiyil suit in which: .one of-the parties, City of S.t- Louis, is a political subdivision,of the State; (2) the decree, and,the application, of thei zoning ordinance to, the use.,of , appellant’s property violates appellant’s constitutional..rights .by, taking her, property without,just compensation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. St. Louis Poster Advertising Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. State Ex Rel. Oliver Cadillac Co. v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  4. Glencoe Lime & Cement Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. Landau v. LevinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. Butler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of LadueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Deacon v. City of LadueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Kansas City v. HoweMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. McKinney v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API