City of St. Louis v. Friedman
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
[476]
CLARK, J.
Defendant .appeals fronda decree, of-.thecir-cuit court, enjoining Rer from psing-,her real, estate in a. certain manner .in-violation of-the city’s zoning-ordinance. . ,
Respondent questions our jurisdiction, ■ which appellant ■ attempts to invoke on two grounds-.- (1) this is, a..eiyil suit in which: .one of-the parties, City of S.t- Louis, is a political subdivision,of the State; (2) the decree, and,the application, of thei zoning ordinance to, the use.,of , appellant’s property violates appellant’s constitutional..rights .by, taking her, property without,just compensation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- St. Louis Poster Advertising Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- State Ex Rel. Oliver Cadillac Co. v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Glencoe Lime & Cement Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Landau v. LevinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. Butler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of LadueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Deacon v. City of LadueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Kansas City v. HoweMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- McKinney v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.