Legal Opinion

Huttig v. City of Richmond Heights

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 11, 1963No. 49485PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGER, Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment suit in which plaintiffs, as owners of a tract in Richmond Heights, sought tO' have the Court declare the City’s general zoning ordinance No. 1685 invalid as to their tract because it was allegedly unreasonable, arbitrary and confiscatory as so applied: The trial court decided for the defendants; the individual defendants are city officials. The three last named respondents who intervened and later became defendants, are Trustees of an adjoining residential subdivision. Plaintiffs have raised various constitutional questions; these contentions, in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. Village of Richton ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Duffcon Concrete Products, Inc. v. Borough of CresskillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  5. Forbes v. HubbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Rosedale-Skinker Improvement Ass'n v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Allen v. CoffelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Stephen T. Burns v. City of Des PeresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. Strandberg v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. City of Kirkwood v. City of Sunset HillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API