Marcus v. Marcus
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mollen, P. J.
The instant appeal and cross appeal present several challenges to the trial court’s resolution of the equitable distribution of the marital assets of the plaintiff wife and the defendant husband, including the trial court’s categorization, valuation and ultimate distribution of those assets. Since the portions of the judgment which have been appealed from do not affect Elizabeth Atwood Metz, her appeal is dismissed on the ground that she is not aggrieved thereby (see, CPLR 5511). For the reasons that follow, we modify the judgment from which the parties appeal.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Price v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Arvantides v. ArvantidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Damiano v. DamianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Granade-Bastuck v. BastuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Hackett v. HackettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Zelnik v. ZelnikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Sagarin v. SagarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Fuegel v. FuegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.