Legal Opinion

Arvantides v. Arvantides

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1985PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with costs, to reinstate the trial court’s determination valuing defendant’s dental practice at $178,500 and, as so modified, it should be affirmed, and the case remitted to Supreme Court for the entry of an amended judgment in accordance with this memorandum.

The Appellate Division’s reliance on the testimony of defendant’s expert in determining the value of defendant’s dental practice was erroneous, and constituted an abuse of discretion, *1034because that witness was admittedly unfamiliar with the criteria for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. RodgersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Patron v. PatronNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Ackley v. AckleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Ward v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. McSparron v. McSparronNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Holterman v. HoltermanNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Griggs v. GriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Marcus v. MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API