Arvantides v. Arvantides
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with costs, to reinstate the trial court’s determination valuing defendant’s dental practice at $178,500 and, as so modified, it should be affirmed, and the case remitted to Supreme Court for the entry of an amended judgment in accordance with this memorandum.
The Appellate Division’s reliance on the testimony of defendant’s expert in determining the value of defendant’s dental practice was erroneous, and constituted an abuse of discretion, *1034because that witness was admittedly unfamiliar with the criteria for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rodgers v. RodgersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Patron v. PatronNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Ackley v. AckleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Ward v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by111 opinions
- O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- McSparron v. McSparronNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Holterman v. HoltermanNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Griggs v. GriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Marcus v. MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.