Fuegel v. Fuegel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), dated October 6, 1998, as (1) granted the plaintiff a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment, (2) fixed the date of valuation of the marital assets as the date of the commencement of the action, and (3) directed an equal distribution of the marital assets, and the plaintiff cross-appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of the same judgment as (1) determined that certain securities held by the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Granade-Bastuck v. BastuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Lischynsky v. LischynskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Kalisch v. KalischAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Seidman v. SeidmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Marcus v. MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Penna v. PennaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Shapiro v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Crescimanno v. CrescimannoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Benabu v. RienzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- McGuire v. McGuireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.