Legal Opinion

Price v. Price

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1986PublishedCited by 290 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*11OPINION OF THE COURT

Hancock, Jr., J.

We hold that under the Equitable Distribution Law an increase in the value of separate property of one spouse, occurring during the marriage and prior to the commencement of matrimonial proceedings, which is due in part to the indirect contributions or efforts of the other spouse as homemaker and parent, should be considered marital property (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [d] [3]). Under the statute there are two categories of property: marital property which is subject to equitable distribution and separate property which is not (Domestic Relations…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Ferres v. City of New RochelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. New York State Bankers Ass'n v. AlbrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by290 opinions

  1. Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Hartog v. HartogNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. O'Shea v. O'SheaNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Burns v. BurnsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

285 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API