Damiano v. Damiano
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*133OPINION OF THE COURT
Mollen, P. J.
This appeal concerns a matrimonial action which, having been commenced after the effective date of part B of section 236 of the Domestic Relations Law, is governed by the equitable distribution provisions of that statute. In reviewing the issues presented, we have occasion to consider for the first time the question of whether and to what extent one spouse has a right, under equitable distribution, to the other spouse’s employment pension or annuity.
The parties were married in June, 1958 and have four children, the oldest born January 31, 1960, the youngest…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cearley v. CearleyTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Holbrook v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Bloomer v. BloomerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Leighton v. LeightonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Daffin v. DaffinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Rodgers v. RodgersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Wegman v. WegmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Davidson v. DavidsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.