Perkins v. Pacific Fruit Exchange
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued on an alleged guaranty of a minimum return on fruit delivered to the defendant and sold for plaintiff’s account. The cause was tried with a jury and plaintiff had judgment. The defendant moved for an instructed verdict and, this motion having been denied, thereafter moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. This motion was denied and defendant appeals upon typewritten transcripts.
The plaintiff was the owner of a pear orchard; the defendant for twenty years past had been engaged in the business of receiving fruit on consignment and selling the same for the account of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- First National Bank v. FarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Ewing v. HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- People v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Cannon v. LongWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- J. T. Fargason Co. v. DudleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brock v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Manuel v. Calistoga Vineyard Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Garber v. Prudential InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Garber v. Prudential InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962