Legal Opinion
Brock v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
California Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1938No. S. F. 15898PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
By this appeal, the right to recover upon a statutory bond given pursuant to the Produce Dealers Act of 1927 (Stats. 1927, p. 1812), is challenged by the surety. It contends that the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff is not sustained by the evidence.
The suit was brought by the Director of Agriculture, in his official capacity, in conformity with the provisions of the act. The real party in interest is C. G. DeRaad, a fruit grower, and the present controversy concerns his transactions with A. G. Johns and H. A. Bonzagni, doing business as Central Fruit Distributors. In the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Union Stock Yards Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- California Bean Growers Ass'n v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Shelley v. ByersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Betzer v. OlneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bank of America v. DowdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Airlines Reporting Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Whittemore Homes, Inc. v. FleishmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- B. J. Carney & Co. v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Nielsen v. HannafordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.