Legal Opinion

Manuel v. Calistoga Vineyard Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1936No. Civ. 5464PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment based upon a verdict of a jury awarding to plaintiff the sum of $1484.80 for grapes delivered to defendants.

Originally the complaint was in three counts. To this complaint a general demurrer was interposed and overruled, whereupon defendant answered. Upon the trial a nonsuit was granted as to the first two causes of action in the complaint, of which ruling no complaint is made so that we confine ourselves to the consideration of the third count in the complaint.

This count alleges the corporate capacity of the Calistoga Vineyard Company, Ltd., and that this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Santa Barbara v. EldredCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Peterkin v. Randolph Marketing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Perkins v. Pacific Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nungaray v. Pleasant Valley Lima Bean Growers & Warehouse Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Johnson v. MeadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Rodriguez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API