Legal Opinion · Dissent

Garber v. Prudential Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1962No. Civ. 25284Published

1Dissent

FILES, J., Dissenting.

—With some regret I must dissent because I cannot find in the record the evidence which would support the judgment. Although there is more than one ground for reversal, these remarks are directed to the single issue of whether defendant had any duty to provide for the safety of the decedent. This turns on the question of agency to contract. The individuals whose alleged deliction caused the death were not sued, and hence the agency question could dispose of the entire case.

There can be no doubt that the deceased was, as to the defendant, an independent contractor. He…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Leming v. Oilfields Trucking Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Gallagher v. California Pacific Title & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Taylor v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Vind v. Asamblea Apostolica De La Fe en Christo JesusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API