Legal Opinion
Hanna v. Gregg
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 24, 1923No. 11487PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHACKELFORD, C.
The plaintiff below, Mary B. Hanna, plaintiff in error here, commenced this action in the district court of Seminole county, Okla., on the 30th day of January, 1916, against the defendants below, G. W. Gregg and Mae Gregg, defendants in error here.
The suit was brought by the plaintiff against defendants upon a $1,000 promissory note dated March 1, 1915, and due five years after date with interest at six per cent, per annum and matured interest coupons, for judgment for the amount due, and for the foreclosure of the mortgage upon certain real estate located in Seminole…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Curtis & Gartside Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Barnes v. Universal Tire Protector Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Foster v. LeftwichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Voris v. BirdsallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Trotter v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by10 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Westville v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Myrick v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Bartels v. SuterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Beesley v. Wm. A. Nicholson Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Eldridge v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.