Legal Opinion

Jones v. Robbins

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1889No. 2689PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Bell. Tried below before Hon. W. A. Blackburn. Tlje opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Hobby, Judge.

The title of the appellees to the land in controversy depends exclusively upon the validity of the power of attorney executed by the appellants, husband and wife, on the 29th November, 1883, authorizing W. J. Jones, as their agent and attorney in fact, to sell and convey this land, which then constituted their homestead in Bell county. The proof of the execution of this instrument, as shown by the official certificate, is as follows:

“ The State of Texas, County of Galveston.—Before me, Wm. R. Johnson, a notary public in and for the above State-and county, on this day personally…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sowers v. PetersonTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Cannon v. BoutwellTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Langton v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Warren v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Downs v. PorterTexas Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. FantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Bogart v. Cowboy State Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Skirvin v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Arp v. JacobsWyoming Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Williams v. CessnaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API