Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Boutwell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1880No. Case No. 969PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Hunt. Tried below before the Hon. Green J. Clark. A number of propositions were argued by counsel not necessary in view of the opinion to notice, nor would a full statement of the case make the opinion clearer.

1Opinion of the Court

Gould, Associate Justice.

Appellant’s title to the land sued for depended on the validity of a power of attorney, executed and privily acknowledged by Mary C. Fisher, in October, 1856, authorizing her husband, George Fisher, to sell and convey, for her benefit, the land now in controversy, being her separate property, and upon a conveyance of said land by George Fisher, acting for himself, and for his wife under said power of attorney, made February 5, 1858.

The district court held these instruments insufficient to divest the wife’s title; and in our opinion the court did not err in so ruling.

A…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fowler v. ShearerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  2. Baxter v. BodkinIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kellett v. TriceTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Brown v. HearonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Merriman v. BlalackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Mexia v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API