Legal Opinion

State v. Wembley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 8, 2007No. A05-245PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.

A jury found Earl Wembley guilty of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. The district court admitted into evidence a videotaped interview of the victim and replayed the videotape for the jury during deliberations without Wembley present. Wembley argues that the replay without his presence constituted reversible error. The court of appeals held that there was no error. State v. Wembley, 712 N.W.2d 783, 789 (Minn.App.2006). We granted Wembley’s petition for review and affirm.

Appellant Earl Wembley and M.C. lived together for periods between 1989 and 1996, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BastingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. State v. KraushaarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. State v. RobySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. State v. WembleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State v. Stanley J. Maday, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. State v. Castillo-AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  5. State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API