Legal Opinion

State v. Basting

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1997No. C5-96-493PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINGER, Justice.

Defendant Jack Basting challenges his conviction for second-degree assault with a dangerous weapon. The circumstances of his conviction arose from a confrontation with his ex-wife’s boyfriend. Jack Basting admits to punching the boyfriend twice in the face, but claims that his fist did not constitute a dangerous weapon. The trial court determined that Basting’s left fist was a dangerous weapon because of Basting’s status as a professional boxer. Likewise, the court of appeals affirmed, again relying on Basting’s professional boxing experience. Under our case law and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. State v. PenkatySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State v. WembleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Loving v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API