State v. Basting
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
Defendant Jack Basting challenges his conviction for second-degree assault with a dangerous weapon. The circumstances of his conviction arose from a confrontation with his ex-wife’s boyfriend. Jack Basting admits to punching the boyfriend twice in the face, but claims that his fist did not constitute a dangerous weapon. The trial court determined that Basting’s left fist was a dangerous weapon because of Basting’s status as a professional boxer. Likewise, the court of appeals affirmed, again relying on Basting’s professional boxing experience. Under our case law and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. PenkatySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. WembleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Loving v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.