Legal Opinion

State v. Roby

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 30, 1990No. C8-89-2123PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

Defendant-appellant Gary Lee Roby appeals his convictions for murder, both premeditated first degree murder and felony murder during an aggravated robbery. Among other assigned errors, defendant claims that certain evidence should have been suppressed, that certain out-of-court statements were erroneously admitted under the coconspirator hearsay exemption, and that the out-of-court statements were admitted in violation of the confrontation clause. We affirm.

On May 22, 1989, in an upper level duplex apartment in St. Paul, a young woman, Marlizza McIntyre, was shot and killed.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. New York v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. MoormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Chapman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API