Legal Opinion

Smith v. Graham

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 2006No. 94,120PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allegrucci, J.:

Plaintiff Laura Smith filed a suit for damages against defendant Becky Graham, D.O., alleging negligent medical treatment. The district court granted Graham’s motion to dismiss, finding that Smith’s petition was not timely filed. Smith appealed; the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s determination that Smith’s petition was filed outside the proper statute of limitations. This court granted Smith’s petition for review and has jurisdiction under K.S.A. 20-3018(b).

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the statute of limitations…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Martindale v. TennySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. Foster v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. Dougan v. Rossville Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. Rose v. via Christi Health System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schoenholz v. HinzmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. Charles Furnald v. Anthony Hughes and Emcasco Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. Seaboard Corp. v. Marsh Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. Dexter v. BrakeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  5. Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. HickoxDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API