Legal Opinion
Foster v. Kansas Department of Revenue
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided March 24, 2006No. 92,250, 92,344PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
• Allegrucci, J.:
In separate cases, Michael Foster and Paul Griggs had their driving privileges suspended by the Kansas Department of Revenue (KDR) for refusing to submit to breath alcohol tests. Each filed a petition in the district court for judicial review of his license suspension. The district court vacated the suspensions on the ground that KDR had not “forthwith set” the matters for hearing as required by K.S.A. 8-1020(d). KDR appealed from tire district court’s decision, and its motion to consol idate the appeals was granted. The court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mid-Continent Specialists, Inc. v. Capital Homes, L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- Cooper v. WerholtzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- State v. MertzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- State v. JakewaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Jones v. the Grain ClubSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- In Re DennisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. InkelaarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Owen Lumber Co. v. ChartrandSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- LSF FRANCHISE REO I, LLC v. Emporia Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Anderson v. Dillard's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.