Seaboard Corp. v. Marsh Inc.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Luckert, J.:
The primary question raised in this appeal is whether the Kansas saving statute, K.S.A. 60-518, applies and saves the plaintiff s action from being barred by the applicable statute of limitation. Under tire Kansas saving statute, a plaintiff who timely files a legal action that is dismissed otherwise than on the merits after any applicable statute of limitation has run may file a second legal action within 6 months of the dismissal, of tire first action without being barred by the statute of limitation.
In this case, the plaintiff argues the…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Scott Culver v. City of Milwaukee, and United States of America, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cohen v. BattagliaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Hemphill v. ShoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- Watco Companies, Inc. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
- Lehman v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
- Alliance Indemnity Co. v. Kerns – McAnanyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.