Legal Opinion

Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Hickox

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 2013No. 11-CV-0445PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLEESE, Associate Judge:

Baseball umpire Edwin Hickox was injured while wearing a mask manufactured by Wilson Sporting Goods Company. Mr. Hickox and his wife brought products-liability claims against Wilson. A jury found for the Hickoxes on all claims. Wilson appeals, arguing that the Hickoxes presented expert testimony that lacked an adequate foundation; that Wilson was entitled to a jury instruction on assumption of risk; and that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We affirm.

I

The Hickoxes’ evidence at trial indicated the following. In 2005, at an annual retreat for Major…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Jules R. Viterbo, Et Ux, (Patricia Viterbo) v. The Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. Liskowitz v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Leichtamer v. American Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Friends of McMillan Park and DC for Reasonable Development v. DC Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. In re Tylenol (Acetaminophen) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Straughn v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. CRAIG L. RUSSELL v. CALL/D, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Farooqui v. Silkwave Holdings Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API