Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Hickox
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
McLEESE, Associate Judge:
Baseball umpire Edwin Hickox was injured while wearing a mask manufactured by Wilson Sporting Goods Company. Mr. Hickox and his wife brought products-liability claims against Wilson. A jury found for the Hickoxes on all claims. Wilson appeals, arguing that the Hickoxes presented expert testimony that lacked an adequate foundation; that Wilson was entitled to a jury instruction on assumption of risk; and that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We affirm.
I
The Hickoxes’ evidence at trial indicated the following. In 2005, at an annual retreat for Major…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jules R. Viterbo, Et Ux, (Patricia Viterbo) v. The Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Liskowitz v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Leichtamer v. American Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Friends of McMillan Park and DC for Reasonable Development v. DC Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In re Tylenol (Acetaminophen) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Straughn v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- CRAIG L. RUSSELL v. CALL/D, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Farooqui v. Silkwave Holdings Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.