Legal Opinion

Dougan v. Rossville Drainage District

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 15, 2000No. 83,543PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J:

Drainage district appeals landowners jury award for damages resulting from a 1993 flood. Appellant claims (1) the landowners claim was barred by the passage of time; (2) the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict; (3) the Kansas Tort Claims Act barred landowner’s action; (4) the court erred in refusing to weigh evidence and determine if the verdict was contrary to the evidence; and (5) the court erred in not enforcing a settlement agreement.

Frank Dougan’s land lies between the Kansas River and Silver Lake in Shawnee County,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Durflinger v. ArtilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Fudge v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. Cerretti v. Flint Hills Rural Electric Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. First Financial Insurance v. BuggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Waste Connections of Kansas, Inc. v. Ritchie Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. Duran v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  4. Burcham v. Unison Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. Wolfe Electric, Inc. v. DuckworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API