Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Hartley

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 27, 1966No. 19,109PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Kilday, Judge:

The appellant was arraigned before a general court-martial convened at Fort Eustis, Virginia, on one charge and specification of premeditated murder, in violation of Article 118, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 918. He pleaded not guilty. In his instructions before findings, the law officer submitted the offenses of premeditated murder; unpremeditated murder, as defined by Article 118(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, supra; murder while engaged in an act inherently dangerous to others, as defined in Article 118(3), supra; involuntary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  2. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. United States v. JuddUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  5. United States v. SandovalUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. BergUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. BergUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. McMonagleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. AllenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API