Legal Opinion

City of Spokane v. Karlsten

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1926No. 19352. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The appellant was originally charged in the police court of Spokane with the violation of an ordinance relating to intoxicating liquors. Upon conviction, he appealed to the superior court, was again convicted, and has appealed to this court. The trial in the superior court was had on the complaint made in the police court.

The principal contention on the appeal is that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a crime. Preliminarily it must he observed that the prosecution is not under the provisions of the state act, and hence the complaint is not affected by the amendment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kizer v. CaufieldWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State v. SheltonWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Town of Kirkland v. FerryWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State v. PolkWashington Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HowardWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State v. BogdonWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. State v. EbelWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State v. RieseWashington Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API