Town of Kirkland v. Ferry
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered August 6, 1906, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action to abate and enjoin a public nuisance.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
This action was decided on demurrer to the complaint, the demurrer having been sustained by the court; and the sufficiency of the complaint is the only question involved. The complaint alleges, that the plaintiff, the town of Kirkland, is a city of the fourth class, located in King county; that defendant Ferry has been, and now is, occupying a certain building in said town, specifically described; that he has been holding the same under the other defendants, Kirkland Land & Improvement Company and Stewart & Holmes Drug Company; that a portion of the premises has been, and is now, maintained…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kizer v. CaufieldWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. SheltonWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- County on Yakima v. ConradWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Geissler v. GeisslerWashington Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stead v. FortnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- City of Seattle v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- City of Seattle v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- City of Spokane v. KarlstenWashington Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.