Legal Opinion
State v. Harding
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 1, 1919No. 15564PublishedCited by 24 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered March 26, 1919, upon a trial and conviction of violating the prohibition law.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The defendant, Harding, was adjudged guilty in the superior court for Pierce county upon an information filed therein against him charging:
“That the said James Harding, in the county of Pierce, in the state of Washington, on or about the first day of February, nineteen hundred and nineteen, then and there being, unlawfully did have in his possession intoxicating liquor, to-wit: thirty-eight (38) pints of whiskey, he, the said James Harding, then *607and there not being a regularly ordained clergyman, priest or rabbi, . .
Our statute defines the offense of which the defendant was convicted as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. Le PitreWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. BokienWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Kizer v. CaufieldWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. HoledgerWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. Van WatersWashington Supreme Court · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- State v. LindenWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. MosesWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Knowling v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. GriebelMontana Supreme Court · 1922
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.