State v. Bogdon
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.
— Appellants were charged and convicted under the jointist statute, Bern. Comp. Stat., §7328 [P. C. §3179h], and have appealed from the judgment and sentence.
At the close of the state’s case, appellants moved for the withdrawal of the case from the jury; at the close of all of the evidence, they moved for an instructed verdict of not guilty; and after the return of the jury’s verdict of guilty, they moved for a judgment non obstante-, each of which motions was by the court denied.
The assignments of error are based upon these rulings, and raise the single question of the sufficiency of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Wilburn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- State v. CritzerWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Aronson v. SweeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- City of Spokane v. KarlstenWashington Supreme Court · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PerezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- State v. EbelWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. JohnoffWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. BallWashington Supreme Court · 1928