Legal Opinion

Morris v. Craig

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1933No. Docket No. 8755PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

On petition for rehearing after order dismissing appeal.

The order as entered in the minutes reads as follows: “Motion is granted and appeal is dismissed.” The court had prepared the following memorandum which by inadvertence was not entered in full in the minutes. “By the Court: On Motion for dismissal of appeal on account of failure of appellant to file brief within the time allowed by section 4 of Rule I, and section 1 of Rule V of the Rules of Practice of this court. It appearing from the record that no brief was served or filed within the time provided; and that no application…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carter v. PaigeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Bourne v. RootCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clinton v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API