Chapman v. Bank of California
California Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the coin ¡r.„
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment and order denying a new trial, on the ground that the transcript was not filed in time.
The judgment, in favor of defendant, was rendered September 27, 1889. The order overruling plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was made August 28, 1890. Notice of appeal from the judgment and order was filed and served September 25th, and undertaking on appeal filed September 27th.
The time for filing the printed transcript prescribed by rule 2 of this court expired November 5, 1890.
On November 15th, no transcript having been filed, respondent served notice of his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hoyt v. San Francisco & North Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by11 opinions
- Murphy v. KrummCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Bourne v. RootCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Spratlin v. HallerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
- Clinton v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Curtin v. IngleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.