Pacific Power Co. v. State
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and John T. Nourse, Deputy Attorney-General, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
A motion has been made to dismiss the appeal in each of the above-entitled causes. The facts are identical and the cases may be considered together. The motion is made upon the grounds: “ (1) That the said defendant and appellant is not a ‘party aggrieved’ by the judgment in this case within the provisions of section 938 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the state of California. (2) That the said defendant and appellant has failed to comply with the provisions of rule II, subdivision 4 of the rules of this court in that it has failed to file its printed points and authorities within the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Estate of ColtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bourne v. RootCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- City of Los Angeles v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Hotels El Rancho, Inc. v. PrayNevada Supreme Court · 1947
- Clinton v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Gulf States Theatres of Louisiana, Inc. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974