Legal Opinion
Pike County Light & Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 22, 1983No. Appeal, No. 2736 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
This is an appeal by Pike .County Light and Power Company (Pike) of an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) which disallowed $597,917.00 of purchased power expense in the settling of rates under Pike’s Supplement No. 12 to its Tariff Electric-Pa. P.U.C. No. 7.1 We affirm.
*271Pike operates in the vicinity of the boroughs of Matamoras and Milford in the County of Pike, Pennsylvania and serves approximately 2,548 residential customers, 426 general service customers, 4 municipal street lighting customers, and 77 private area lighting customers.2 Pike is a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Public Utilities Commission v. Attleboro Steam & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- New England Power Co. v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Power Commission v. Southern California Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. ThornburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Public Service Co. of New Hampshire v. PatchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. The Council of the City of New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.