Legal Opinion

Morphy v. Morphy

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 31, 1974No. 6780PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

The question presented by this appeal is whether the trial judge abused his discretion in renewing an order for alimony which had expired by force of RSA 458:19. Morphy v. Morphy, 112 N.H. 507, 298 A.2d 580 (1972).

The parties were divorced on July 3, 1962, after 20 years of marriage by a decree which incorporated their stipulations which in part provided for the payment to the plaintiff by the defendant the sum of $75 per week until her remarriage. The defendant continued to pay $75 per week until July 1971 although the order had expired in 1965. RSA 458:19; Morphy v. Morphy supra. After the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  2. Collette v. ColletteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1968
  3. Morphy v. MorphySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  4. Peterson v. BuxtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Calderwood v. CalderwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  2. Henry v. HenrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. Healey v. HealeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Logan v. LoganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  5. In re CanawaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API