Peterson v. Buxton

The defendant contends that there were no.such changes in circumstances between the original decree and the order of modification as to justify a reduction in the order for payments into the savings account and that the Trial Court abused his discretion.

As the court said in Guggenheimer v. Guggenheimer, 99 N. H. 399, 403: “ The Court has wide discretion in determining the amount that a father shall be required to contribute for the support of his family. ” This rule applies to modifications as well as to the original award. Benjamin v. Benjamin, 99 N. H. 117, 119.

A modification will be set…