Healey v. Healey

The question presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in renewing an order for alimony which had expired by force of RSA 458:19. A hearing was held before a Master {Peter J. Bourque, Esq.) and by court order dated March 23, 1976, Everett Healey was ordered to continue alimony payments in the amount of $45 per month. In the course of the hearing, defendant objected and excepted to certain rulings of the master. Defendant also moved to have the court’s decree set aside and for a rehearing. Subject to defendant’s exceptions these motions were denied by the Court {Loughlin, J.),…