Legal Opinion
C. Dudley De Velbiss Co. v. Kraintz
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 8, 1951No. Civ. 14178PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
The appellant sued for a declaratory judgment. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend and this appeal was taken from the judgment for the defendant for costs.
Ordinance 385 is Contra Costa County’s building ordinance, enacted in 1947. In 1948 it was amended by ordinances 449 and 456. All three were pleaded in full.
Appellant attacks ordinance 385 and particularly section III thereof as amended, in numerous respects and for various reasons, claiming inter alia that it fails to intelligibly classify buildings subject to its own regulatory provisions; that there…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- King v. MortimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Tiburon v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Coruccini v. LambertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Ramos v. CypherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Zubarau v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011