Legal Opinion

Ramos v. Cypher

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1955No. Civ. No. 8717PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

Plaintiff, Joe R. Ramos, brought this action against the above named defendants asking for a declaration of his rights and duties and a determination of his obligations arising out of a series of transactions with C. L. Cypher, during his lifetime, his administratrix after his death, Peerless Casualty Company, and the city of Vacaville. The *649administratrix moved that the place of trial he changed to the county of Napa, in which county the estate of her decedent was being probated, claiming that she was entitled to such order by virtue of the provisions of section 395.1 of the Code of Civil…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moss v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Coruccini v. LambertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. C. Dudley De Velbiss Co. v. KraintzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metzger v. SilvermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Metzger v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API