Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. Peterson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1901No. 18,982PublishedCited by 37 opinions

From the Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

Appellee as the administratrix of Frank Peterson, her deceased husband, instituted this action to recover damages on account of his alleged negligent killing by appellant. A trial in the lower court before a jury resulted in a verdict being awarded her for $1,500, and over appellant’s motion for a new trial judgment was rendered for this amount. Appellant under its assignment of errors contends: (1) That the second paragraph of the complaint upon which, as the record discloses and the parties concede, the judgment in question is based, is insufficient on demurrer; (2) that the court erred in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. StegemeierIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. ConoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Bluedorn v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Crowley v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. HoulihanIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Nickey v. SteuderIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API