Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Powers
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Decatur Circuit Court; Marshall Hacker, Judge. Action by George Powers against tbe Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Eailway Company. Prom a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $6,500, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMyeks, J.
This action was instituted by appellee against appellant for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been inflicted by appellant on appellee.
The complaint is in one paragraph. The material allegations are that defendant, at the city of Greensburg, has a large yard, containing about sixty acres of ground, covered with main tracks, side-tracks, switches and spurs, amounting in all to seven miles of track, over which tracks all incoming and outgoing trains pass and repass; that such yards were in charge of a yardmaster, and that repair shops and a roundhouse are situated in said yard; that…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Plummer v. DillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Schofield v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Gamble v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- Crossgrove v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Lincoln Operating Co. v. GillisIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Gilliland v. BondurantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Kempf v. HimselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.