Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. Duncan
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom the Shelby Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.
The appellee, as the administrator of the estate of one James M. Jack, deceased, sued the appellant to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the widow and children of said decedent, resulting to them on account of his death, caused by the alleged negligence of the appellant.
The issues formed were tried by a jury, resulting in a special verdict, upon which the court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the damages assessed, *525$5,000, over appellant’s motion for a new trial. Error is assigned here, among other things, upon the action of the court in overruling that motion.
Am…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Mann v. Belt Railroad & Stock Yard Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Smith v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. StickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. KemperIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FrazeIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Aurelius v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. BoytsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.