Allied Fidelity Insurance Co. v. Bank of Oklahoma, National Ass'n
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
The only issue before us in this suit by a depositor against its bank is whether the statute of limitations bars the claim. Bank argues the time-bar commenced running when bank notified depositor it had paid out funds represented by depositor’s certificates of deposit to the wrong person. Depositor maintains the statute didn’t start to run until it unsuccessfully made demand on the bank for its money. The trial court and Court of Appeals held that limitations had run and gave bank summary judgment. On certiora-ri we conclude that depositor is correct, and thus reverse and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Loyal Order of Moose, Lodge 1785 v. CavanessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. v. VickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Steenbergen v. First Federal Savings & Loan of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Kansas City Title & Trust Co. v. Fourth National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Digital Design Group, Inc. v. Information Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- May-Li Barki, M.D., Inc. v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Beshara v. Southern National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Wille v. Geico Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Chickasaw Telephone Co. v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.