Legal Opinion
Steenbergen v. First Federal Savings & Loan of Chickasha
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 8, 1987No. 63166PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
Plaintiff/appellant Bobbie Steenbergen had two accounts with the defendant/ap-pellee First Federal Savings and Loan of Chickasha. The first was a passbook savings account opened with $500.00 in the names of Renee Steenbergen (her daughter) or Bobbie Steenbergen. The second was a certificate of deposit for $7500.00 in the names of Bobbie Steenbergen or Velma Hooker. All funds were the inheritance of Bobbie Steenbergen and hers was the only authorized signature on both accounts.
On October 27,1980 Bobbie went to First Federal and announced that she wished to close out both…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Owens v. Andrews Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Davidson v. First Bank & Trust Co., YaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- United States Zinc Co. v. ColburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Federal National Bank v. LindseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- State Guaranty Bank v. DoerflerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Lawmaster v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Gilmore v. WeatherfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- AMERICAN BIOMEDICAL GROUP, INC. v. TECHTROL, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Welty v. Martinaire of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- First State Bank v. Diamond Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.