Legal Opinion
Knight v. United States
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 14, 1993No. CIV-91-1704-PCT-RCBPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BROOMFIELD, District Judge.
Defendant moves to dismiss and in the alternative moves for summary judgment (“motion to dismiss”). Plaintiff responds to this motion by filing a motion to strike. Defendant opposes the motion to strike. Before the court ruled on either defendant’s motion to dismiss or plaintiffs motion to strike, plaintiff filed an additional Motion to Defer Consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant opposes that motion as untimely. After consideration of the parties’ written arguments, the court rules on these three motions.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Norman D. Carter and Cecilia P. Carter v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Naegele v. AlbersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Thomas v. Bet Sound-Stage Restaurant/BrettCo, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Milk Drivers, Dairy & Ice Cream Employees, Laundry & Dry Cleaning Drivers, Clerical & Allied Workers, Local Union No. 387 v. DairyDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2003
- Big Stone Broadcasting, Inc. v. LindbloomDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2001
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Admiral Maintenance Service, L.P.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.