Legal Opinion

Milk Drivers, Dairy & Ice Cream Employees, Laundry & Dry Cleaning Drivers, Clerical & Allied Workers, Local Union No. 387 v. Dairy

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided November 26, 2003No. 4:03-CV-40385PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE

GRITZNER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Clerk’s No. 16). The Court finds a hearing is not necessary and considers the motion fully submitted. Attorneys for the Plaintiff are Paige Fiedler, Scott Soldon, and Yingtao Ho; attorneys for the Defendant are Sharon Malheiro and Stephen Darden. For the following reasons, the Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Plaintiff, Milk Drivers, Dairy and Ice Cream…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knight v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1993
  2. Superior Beverage Co. v. OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1971
  3. Jones v. City of TopekaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  4. Krass v. Thomson-CGR Medical Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1987

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. All Energy Corp. v. Energetix, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2012
  2. Cason v. St. Louis Public SchoolsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
  3. Danzig v. LoanMe, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  4. Deltro Electric Ltd. v. Electric Power Systems International, Inc.et alDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  5. Dowell v. BernhardtDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API