Legal Opinion

Alpena National Bank v. Greenbaum

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Ingham. (Peck, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.

This case was before this Court at the January term, 1889, and is reported in 74 Mich. 157.

The Prentiss Lumber Company was a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Michigan, and was doing business at the city of Alpena, where it owned a saw-mill, and was engaged in the manufacture and sale of lumber. On September 7, 1883, it was largely in debt; and on account of losses and financial embarrassments, it was not able to meet its commercial paper at maturity, and, in order to secure the payment of certain classes of its paper and debts, it executed to George L. Maltz, of Alpena,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bourreseau v. Detroit Evening Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Alpena National Bank v. GreenbaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Telles v. LyndeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1891
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Township of Deerfield v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. McKibbin v. Corporation & Securities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API