Legal Opinion

Bourreseau v. Detroit Evening Journal Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1886PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to superior court of Detroit. (Chipman, J.) Action for libel. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinions.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action for libel. The article complained of was published in the Detroit Evening Journal in its issue of July 29, 1885.

The whole of it is set out in the declaration, and is reproduced here, including the innuendoes inserted by the pleader:

“ UNWARRANTED OUTRAGE.
“Danger of Walking Alonein Ecorse and Springwells — Michael Murphy's Experience — A Poor Man Nearly Beaches Friends,

When He is Arrested and Imprisoned.

“Instances of the outrages practiced upon reputable people who may unfortunately pass through the township of Ecorse,. by the justices and constables, keep coming to notice.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hunt v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Foster v. ScrippsMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Mix v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
  4. Sullings v. ShakespeareMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Huson v. DaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. McDuff v. Detroit Evening Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Warner v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Belknap v. BallMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Miles v. Louis Wasmer, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. McGinnis v. George Knapp & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API