Legal Opinion

Alpena National Bank v. Greenbaum

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Alpena. (Emerick, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Defendants were sued on two notes made on June’ 21, 1883, and August 25, 1883, payable each in four months from date, to the order of plaintiff's cashier; the principal of the two notes making 82,177.19. The notes were signed by the Prentiss Lumber Company, and indorsed by Greenbaum and Epsteyn, who by the form of the paper became liable as sureties of the maker. Before the notes matured the principal maker failed, and gaye mortgages to George L. Maltz, the president and head of the plaintiff bank, but *158in his individual name, to provide, among other things, for paper held by the bank,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baker-Evans Grain Co. v. RicordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Alpena National Bank v. GreenbaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Alpena National Bank v. GreenbaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Carpenter v. OsbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API