Legal Opinion
People v. Reynolds
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 1888PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Exceptions from Tuscola. (Beach, J.). Respondent was convicted of obtaining goods by false pretenses. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The respondent in this cause was tried and convicted in the circuit court for the county of Tuscola for obtaining a stock of drugs and groceries of one Florence L. Coy by false pretenses, and brings the case into this Court upon exceptions.
The information was filed under section 9161 of Howell’s Statutes, which provides:
“ Every person who,» with intent to defraud or cheat another, shall designedly, by color of and false token or writing, or_ by any other false pretense, cause any person to grant,” etc., “ or obtain from any person any money, personal property, or valuable thing,” etc., “shall…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. DeLaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- People v. TompkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. KristMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. BeheeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- State v. BusheySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1902
- People v. CheffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Alpena National Bank v. GreenbaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.