In Re the Brainerd National Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
This case raises two issues of practical importance to real property law. Does a trial court have jurisdiction under Minn.R. Civ.P. 60.02 to vacate a Torrens title decree for excusable neglect of counsel? And, after foreclosure of a mortgage on real property, must a senior lienholder file notices of intent to redeem each lien held, even though the liens are consecutive, in order to protect those interests as against a more junior redemption? The trial court first exercised such jurisdiction by vacating a newly-issued decree of Torrens title, then rescinded the vacation of title…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Baart v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- In Re the Welfare of K.T.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Guillaume & Associates, Inc. v. Don-John Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Konantz v. SteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Pamperin v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lobato v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Rael v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Leek v. American Express Property CasualtyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- In re Civil Commitment of LonerganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Park Elm Homeowner's Ass'n v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.