Legal Opinion

In Re the Brainerd National Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 14, 1986No. C9-84-863PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

This case raises two issues of practical importance to real property law. Does a trial court have jurisdiction under Minn.R. Civ.P. 60.02 to vacate a Torrens title decree for excusable neglect of counsel? And, after foreclosure of a mortgage on real property, must a senior lienholder file notices of intent to redeem each lien held, even though the liens are consecutive, in order to protect those interests as against a more junior redemption? The trial court first exercised such jurisdiction by vacating a newly-issued decree of Torrens title, then rescinded the vacation of title…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Baart v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. In Re the Welfare of K.T.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Guillaume & Associates, Inc. v. Don-John Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Konantz v. SteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Pamperin v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lobato v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. Rael v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Leek v. American Express Property CasualtyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. In re Civil Commitment of LonerganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Park Elm Homeowner's Ass'n v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API