Pamperin v. Scanlan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Fillmore county, Farmer, J., presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Action of ejectment. The defendant denies plaintiff’s title, and alleges title in himself. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and the facts found are substantially as follows:
In June, 1876, Ward, Hobart and Kevin, then the owners of the-premises, executed a mortgage thereon to Calista F. Sawyer. In December, 1877, Hobart and Ward, then the owners of an undivided half of the premises, executed a mortgage thereon to defendant. In May, 1878, Kevin, then the owner of the other undivided half of the-premises, executed a mortgage thereon to one O’Hara, who, on the-14th of May, 1880,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tinkcom v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Bingham v. Board of Supervisors of Winona CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
- Lloyd v. KarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- People ex rel. Post v. RansomNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- People ex rel. Post v. FlemingNew York Supreme Court · 1847
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sprague v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Bartleson v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Graybow-Daniels Co. v. PinottiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- In Re the Brainerd National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Tomasko v. CottonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.